Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- From: Bill Marcum <bmarcum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 08:28:13 -0400
On 17 Jun 2006 15:43:52 -0700, Tom
<tomlobato@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What if you just copy the data to the local machine instead of mounting
John-Paul Stewart escreveu:
Tom wrote:
Well, I just need my program to access remote smbfs share, wheter the
kernel know or not (but if it know, does not write to /proc/mounts).
For example, try the url 'smb://<windows_on_lan>/<share_on_windows>' on
konqueror. It access the share without appear on mtab or /proc/mounts.
Do you really need to *mount* it then? Can you not use either the
command-line smbclient utility or the libsmbclient library? The library
is what Konqueror uses for smb:// URLs without mounting them, AIUI.
Please, read my answer to Dances With Crows (one msg before this in
thread).
There I say I have a executable (builded in clip, if it matters) that
needs access remote smbfs. If I can do it without mount, no problem, I
just need hide if someone try "cat /proc/mounts".
it?
--
No, I don't have a drinking problem.
I drink, I get drunk, I fall down.
No problem!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- From: Tom
- Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- References:
- Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- From: Tom
- Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- From: Unruh
- Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- From: Tom
- Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- From: John-Paul Stewart
- Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- From: Tom
- Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- Prev by Date: Re: Unable to Install On Disk
- Next by Date: Re: Getting started with old laptop
- Previous by thread: Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- Next by thread: Re: Mount without /proc/mounts entry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
