Re: cups problem
- From: "Panivino" <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Jul 2006 07:46:34 -0700
I don't think so. As i've said the list of files is just an example. As
a matter of fact the command is normally called from a number of
scripts I've written and it works perfectly for directories containing
many more files (eg. 50 page faxes, each page 1 jpg)...
1) I scan files one day, my scanner assigns to each scanned page theFrom what I've observed (I COULD be wrong) this ONLY happens when:
following names, eg:
scan0001.jpg scan0002.jpg scan0003.jpg
2) I scan files a few days later, in between I've scanned more files
(in other directories) so the next files in the directory could be;
scan0010.jpg scan0011.jpg scan0012.jpg
When I run the command (or the command runs triggered by my script) it
will only print the first 3 files.
Apart from that the command (when I run it manually) clearly states
that the job (in this case of 6 pages) has been sent to the printer....
but only 3 are printed.
The Natural Philosopher wrote :
I wonder if your shell limits the number of arguments it can pass..?
.
- References:
- cups problem
- From: Panivino
- Re: cups problem
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- cups problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Scripting apps to appear on different desktop
- Next by Date: Re: Problems with SanDisk USB stick
- Previous by thread: Re: cups problem
- Next by thread: Re: cups problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|