Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Robert Heller <heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:05:44 +0200
At Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:30:53 GMT Aragorn <stryder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 14:46, heavytull stood up and addressed the
masses in /comp.os.linux.misc/ as follows...:
sticking to the specs of those *old* systems for nostalgic people
Narrow-minded thinking, picturing "the PC" as the only computer system in
existence?
yes probably. I'm not suposed to know what the whole world is composed
of.
Instead of being arrogant, you may want to snip the irrelevant sections from
your post and leave in the proper attribution, instead of doing the
opposite.
What about people working on dumb serial terminals on UNIX
machines?
huh?? whou!!
what about people on mars? what about poppies, roses and moses?
There are to my knowledge no sentient beings on Mars, but there *are* plenty
of people working on mainframes and minicomputers via text-only serial line
terminals.
And lots of us using xterms + slogin as well!
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software -- Linux Installation and Administration
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database
heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk
.
- References:
- can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: heavytull
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: heavytull
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: heavytull
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- Prev by Date: Re: how to tell the dynamic linker to load libc.so.6 other than the one exists in /lib
- Next by Date: Re: Help me choose the Linux desktop distribution l should use
- Previous by thread: Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- Next by thread: Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- Index(es):