Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: "heavytull" <heavytull@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Sep 2006 08:41:03 -0700
yes, sureTerrorists appear to be easier to track down and contain than viruses andyou have evidence?
their writers.
Whatever you say has to be proven unless it is considered as your
personal view
I wrote the word "appear", so that means that there's a reasonable degree of
doubt.
Why does everyone appear to need hard statistics these days before"they will as much as accept one word from you? "???
they will as much as accept one word from you? :-/
Highly overrated FUD. No modern cellphone causes any of the things it was2Watts is actually huge! fortunately the phone rarely works at that
accused of causing ten years ago. They're only 2 Watts of power or
something like that.
power.
mind that 500mW is already very high; high anough to give you a
sensation of heat of the ear you hold the phone against within less
than 3min.
also mind people sensitiveness difference.
this could explain the success of billyBut really the linux users i find on these group are awefull and dumb!
I do not share that sentiment, but on the other hand, it is my conviction
that most of humanity is dumb.
If it were up to me, I would certainly abolish HTML e-mails, yes. If a textIt seems you do not like the html technology while I never pointed with
needs to be sent via e-mail and that text needs to be formatted, an open
standard formatted document can be sent as an attachment.
my finger the html technology. I just talked about its features.
so I would trust you if you say that html tech is unsafe, moreover if
you can give a safe solution to allow me to get some sort of RTF and
colorful text that would be perfect.
Microsoft doesn't care about quality or about its users. Microsoft onlylike so many companies
cares about getting a product across the counter.
I'm not sure how to adequately describe Microsoft as a company. They seemwow, fascist?
to be having all the trades of a cult internally while profiling themselves
as a fascist corporate entity externally.
alrightFine, up to you then to rewrite the whole way e-mail is being processedis it not arrogance here?
by your e-mail client, by the mailservers and by the protocols then.
No, that was sarcasm. ;-)
--still so myself
With kind regards,
*Aragorn*
(registered GNU/Linux user #223157)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- References:
- can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: heavytull
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: heavytull
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: heavytull
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: heavytull
- Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- From: Aragorn
- can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- Prev by Date: Looking for Linux installation
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for Linux installation
- Previous by thread: Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- Next by thread: Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
- Index(es):