Re: Open source - Free software

On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:35 -0700, v4vijayakumar wrote:
I have been using "open source" and "free software" products for some
time. I want to contribute to them but I couldn't decide between "open
source" and "free software". I would support "open source" at this
level, because we can see what it is doing. I don't know how many of us
can really see the things, but we have some issues in using "free
software". Consider a "free software" web client (browser), it would
comfortably send the confidential info to the person who programmed it
that way.

Expecting replies this way.
x : y

Where,

x is either "Open source" or "Free software", without quotes

y is a statement which supports x to be chosen and it can not be more
than 80 characters in length and, 1 line in height

I hope to get all the replies this way. No fun intended. :)

Let me see if I can get this right :)

Both : Use open source methods to develop free software.

Further explanation:
In that way you will create both free and open source software. Free
software is more about ideology while open source is about business
strategy. Free software focuses on protecting the user's rights and IMHO
all software companies should develop free software. Open source
software is more about creating a quality product in a fast and
efficient way and IMHO this is the best way to develop software.

These two movements differ in their approach to achieve the same goal:
Quality.

Free software looks at software from the user's point of view.
Open source software looks at software from the practical point of view.

You develop free software by choosing the correct license (e.g. GPL) and
you develop open source software by opening up the development to
everybody.

/Tryggvi


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Academic software
    ... If they buy proprietary software rather than using free software, ... formats understood only by one open source program, ... so-called SQL databases actually follow the SQL standard, ... worse in closed source systems where you can't even read the source code ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: [OT] Free Software
    ... >> purely as a hobby or for academic purposes. ... > releasing it as open source may cost them nothing. ... We produce some free software because we really needed it for our own ... a proprietary license. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: MySQL not doing so well in Suns hands
    ... Free software does not need to include open source. ... There were some obligations made by Janet that meant that IDS would be supported and enhanced. ... IDS is getting a lot of new features and enhancements. ...
    (comp.databases.informix)
  • Re: [OT] Re: FAT16/32
    ... "FreeRTOS is licensed under a modified GPL and can be used in commercial applications under this license. ... The same page also lists the differences between your modified GPL and the commercial version of the license. ... While it is certainly true that some free software is more free than others, there is absolutely nothing to equate free software, open source software, or "free and open source" software with a pure GPL license. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto
    ... can't help being upset because one of the most visible Free Software ... Open Source projects chose BK, in spite of BK being proprietary, ... perform services for a Red Hat customer shortly after I joined Red ... > don't want to give our technology to our competitors. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)