Re: PCLinuxOS .93 Big Daddy? A Piece Of ***!!!!!
- From: spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:53:58 GMT
stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx did eloquently scribble:
In comp.os.linux.misc "Balwinder S \"bsd\" Dheeman" <bsd.SANSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: FYI, MS/PC-DOS is and was single-tasking and single-user system, more
: over Windows 95, 98, SE, ME, NT and XP etc. are still single-user
: systems. Are'nt you comparing all these said asses with a tried and test
Again- hate to dig into "discussions" like this but this is factually
incorrect. NT and all successors ( 2K, XP,Vista ) have always been multi
user systems. DOS, 95, 98, ME and so on however are indeed single user
hence more-or-less impossible to make secure and stable.
The difference is that linux is multi-user-at-the-same-time, whilst windows
NT and up are only multi-user accounts but only one at a time.
If this is incorrect, I'd be intregued to know how more than one user can
use a windows box simultaneously.
--
| |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack|
| spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you|
| |can't move, with no hope of rescue. |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)|Consider how lucky you are that life has been |
| in |good to you so far... |
| Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PCLinuxOS .93 Big Daddy? A Piece Of ***!!!!!
- From: Baho Utot
- Re: PCLinuxOS .93 Big Daddy? A Piece Of ***!!!!!
- From: Bob Hauck
- Re: PCLinuxOS .93 Big Daddy? A Piece Of ***!!!!!
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: i/o error problem with dvdrecord disks
- Next by Date: Re: rand vs. random
- Previous by thread: Re: PCLinuxOS .93 Big Daddy? A Piece Of ***!!!!!
- Next by thread: Re: PCLinuxOS .93 Big Daddy? A Piece Of ***!!!!!
- Index(es):