Re: PCLinuxOS .93 Big Daddy? A Piece Of ***!!!!!

spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:



stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx did eloquently scribble:
In comp.os.linux.misc "Balwinder S \"bsd\" Dheeman"
<bsd.SANSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: FYI, MS/PC-DOS is and was single-tasking and single-user system, more
: over Windows 95, 98, SE, ME, NT and XP etc. are still single-user
: systems. Are'nt you comparing all these said asses with a tried and
: test

Again- hate to dig into "discussions" like this but this is factually
incorrect. NT and all successors ( 2K, XP,Vista ) have always been multi
user systems. DOS, 95, 98, ME and so on however are indeed single user
hence more-or-less impossible to make secure and stable.

The difference is that linux is multi-user-at-the-same-time, whilst
windows NT and up are only multi-user accounts but only one at a time.

Windows[whatever] certainly in not multiuser. Unless one goes by the ms
definition of multiuser, which of course is borked.


If this is incorrect, I'd be intregued to know how more than one user can
use a windows box simultaneously.

--
Dancin' in the ruins tonight
Tayo'y Mga Pinoy
.

Quantcast