Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: "Jim Backus" <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:07:37 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:34:37 UTC, pureheart@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<web page download speed details snipped>
Perhaps Linux is just not as well optimized??
Perhaps a different optimisation. IME with OS/2, Windows multi-tasks
much slower than OS/2, but the other side is that the rapid response
of OS/2 must mean that less processor time is available for other
stuff. If Linux has been designed to be better at multi-tasking than
Windows, it may be that it is slower to complete a given task.
Although 1 - 2 seconds vs 4 - 5 seconds for Linux sounds extreme.
--
Jim Backus running OS/2 Warp 3 & 4, Debian Linux and Win98SE
bona fide replies to j <dot> backus <the circle thingy> jita <dot>
demon <dot> co <dot> uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: Peter Köhlmann
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- References:
- Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: pureheart
- Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Prev by Date: Re: non-preemptive Linux version?
- Next by Date: Re: file encoding prob.
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Index(es):