Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: "jdanskinner" <JDanSkinner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Nov 2006 17:01:12 -0800
Peter Köhlmann wrote:
Jim Backus wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:34:37 UTC, pureheart@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<web page download speed details snipped>
Perhaps Linux is just not as well optimized??
Perhaps a different optimisation. IME with OS/2, Windows multi-tasks
much slower than OS/2, but the other side is that the rapid response
of OS/2 must mean that less processor time is available for other
stuff.
I suggest you are all on the wrong track.
I smell FUD.
One should be able to reproduce this on almost any
multi boot system.
I have no multi boot systems, but I do have a Win XP machine
with Foxfire 2.0 and a SuSE 8.1 machine with Mozilla from the period.
Access to several sites ( microsoft.com, msn.com, and several others)
produce mixed results. Sometimes Win XP is quicker, sometimes SuSE
is quicker, but never by more than a second or 2. And more to the
point, findings can not
be reproduced.
Regards...Dan.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: Baho Utot
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: Bit Twister
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- References:
- Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: pureheart
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: Jim Backus
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: Peter Köhlmann
- Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Next by Date: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|