Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:23:34 +0100
Jim Backus wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:34:37 UTC, pureheart@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<web page download speed details snipped>
Perhaps Linux is just not as well optimized??
Perhaps a different optimisation. IME with OS/2, Windows multi-tasks
much slower than OS/2, but the other side is that the rapid response
of OS/2 must mean that less processor time is available for other
stuff.
Nope.
There have been measurements performed to establish how much of overhead
there is for task-switching
Linux was a *lot* faster (needing fewer processor cycles) than windows
So even *if* linux would task-switch more often, it would be able to do so
without any penalty performance wise
If Linux has been designed to be better at multi-tasking than
Windows, it may be that it is slower to complete a given task.
Although 1 - 2 seconds vs 4 - 5 seconds for Linux sounds extreme.
It has simply nothing to do with the /performance/ of linux
It has to do with the /setup/ of the network
Hint: Just selecting a different Name-Server can account for much greater
differences in network throughput
--
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat,
and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: jdanskinner
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- References:
- Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: pureheart
- Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- From: Jim Backus
- Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Prev by Date: Re: file encoding prob.
- Next by Date: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is linux slower than Windows (Firefox)?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|