Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Gordon <gbplinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:21:18 +0000
Aragorn wrote:
*Note* *to* *readers:* The poster I'm replying to is obviously a clear
troll. However, since newbies are involved and other newbies might be
lurking, I will elaborate and refute the trolls claims below.
snip brilliant post....
Wow! Thanks for all that.....I must admit the first real meetings I had with
computers was in the early eighties, just after the IBM AT had been
released.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Linux, why?
- From: Edd
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: snm_uk
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: William Poaster
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: Edd
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: Sean
- To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Aragorn
- Linux, why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Low IDE performance of kernel 2.6.x
- Next by Date: Re: Low IDE performance of kernel 2.6.x
- Previous by thread: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- Next by thread: Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- Index(es):