Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Aragorn <stryder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:01:48 GMT
On Friday 08 December 2006 17:57, William Poaster stood up and addressed the
masses in /comp.os.linux.misc/ as follows...:
Two most interesting & informative posts there, Aragorn. Thanks. :-)
Yeah, I know a lot about Windows for a guy who doesn't even use it, don't I?
<LOL>
Glad you enjoyed it. ;-)
--
With kind regards,
*Aragorn*
(registered GNU/Linux user #223157)
.
- References:
- Linux, why?
- From: Edd
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: snm_uk
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: Aragorn
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: William Poaster
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: Edd
- Re: Linux, why?
- From: Sean
- To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Aragorn
- Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Tony Lawrence
- Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Aragorn
- Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Tony Lawrence
- Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Aragorn
- Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: William Poaster
- Linux, why?
- Prev by Date: Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- Next by Date: KDE KDM add session options
- Previous by thread: Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- Next by thread: Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|