Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: look@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jack Strangio)
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 21:12:47 GMT
Aragorn <stryder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
However - and this is the rumor part - a computer magazine over here
reported on the successor to Vista, which Microsoft was already working on
late last year, and which would be codenamed "Dark Star".
Hmm. I wonder if Slackware's Patrick Volkerding will sue Steve Ballmer
for stealing his "IP Property".
(The default computer name when installing Slackware is "darkstar" unless
you change it to something else.)
Jack
--
Once, they feared you. Then they matched you. Now they are laughing
at you. Soon they will ignore you. You have lost.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- From: Robert M. Riches Jr.
- Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: base64
- Next by Date: Re: Linux, why?
- Previous by thread: Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- Next by thread: Re: To the OP: Wintroll FUD about alleged insecurity refuted (was: Re: Linux why?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
