Re: Debian for "VMWare Windows"
- From: Johan Lindquist <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 08:32:54 +0100
So anyway, it was like, 18:13 CET Dec 13 2006, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
Milan Babuskov was all like, "Dude,
Johan Lindquist wrote:
While they're not exactly fast, they're quite manageable (even the
vista one).
Why do you say that?
It requires about twice the memory allocated to it just to install,
for one thing. Rather steep hardware requirements if you want to
use any of the new "cool" interface features for another. Not to
mention the version of vmware server that's currently available isn't
guaranteed to even be able to host it, as far as I know.
There were some interesting quirks to the guest os installation, as a
matter of fact. Once installed it seems to run without problems, tho.
From what I've heard so far, Vista is much faster than Windwos XP
for example? Reportedly there were performance problems with beta
versions, but the final one is much faster? It is true?
I don't really know, I haven't made any performance comparisons as
such, and if I did I'm not sure I could legally publish them. ;)
--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
08:27:50 up 35 days, 6:09, 3 users, load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.14
Linux 2.6.18.1 x86_64 GNU/Linux Registered Linux user #261729
.
- References:
- Debian for "VMWare Windows"
- From: Christian Christmann
- Re: Debian for "VMWare Windows"
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: Debian for "VMWare Windows"
- From: Johan Lindquist
- Re: Debian for "VMWare Windows"
- From: Milan Babuskov
- Debian for "VMWare Windows"
- Prev by Date: Re: Processes with open handles to unlinked files
- Next by Date: Re: Screen command help: Or can I do this?
- Previous by thread: Re: Debian for "VMWare Windows"
- Next by thread: Linux and VMWare
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|