Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: "Koppe74" <koppe74@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Dec 2006 15:27:14 -0800
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
ray wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:58:21 -0900, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
Current versions of UNIX and AFAIK all versions of Linux do not swap at all;
they page; i.e., they write out the least recently used pages in an attempt
to keep just the working set in memory.
They do actually swap -- or at least in the sense that a process
may be *completly* paged-out (have no pages in memory).
If you look at the output from 'top' (and with 'ps -Af'), you may see
some process-names surrounded by a pair of [...]
=> root 20778 5 0 Dec20 ? 00:00:00 [pdflush]
Such processes are *copmpletly* paged out to disk, and currently
have no piece of them in RAM.
-Koppe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: John-Paul Stewart
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- References:
- swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: General Schvantzkoph
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: ray
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Jean-David Beyer
- swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Prev by Date: Re: help with cinelerra?
- Next by Date: Re: NEWBIE wants older LINUX for learning the basics
- Previous by thread: Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Next by thread: Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|