Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:43:51 -0500
Koppe74 wrote:
If you look at the output from 'top' (and with 'ps -Af'), you may see
some process-names surrounded by a pair of [...]
=> root 20778 5 0 Dec20 ? 00:00:00 [pdflush]
Such processes are *copmpletly* paged out to disk, and currently
have no piece of them in RAM.
I believe that is no longer the meaning of the [] brackets. Recent versions of procps use that notation to indicate kernel threads, IIRC (although I can't find definitive docs at the moment). Things that could never be swapped out (ksoftirqd and kswapd, for example) are listed in square brackets on my system. In fact, I believe pdflush from your example is a kernel thread that couldn't possibly be swapped out (it's responsible for flushing data to disk).
.
- References:
- swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: General Schvantzkoph
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: ray
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Jean-David Beyer
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Koppe74
- swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Prev by Date: Re: NEWBIE wants older LINUX for learning the basics
- Next by Date: Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Previous by thread: Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Next by thread: Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|