Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: ray <ray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:58:22 -0700
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:58:21 -0900, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:22:22 +0000, Ron Hardin wrote:
How big should I partition swap for 2gb ram 2 processors? Planning
out a partition magic run on a 120 gb disk, sharing with windows XP.
The rule of thumb is 2 * RAM size, in your case that would be 4G. This is
There is no such rule of thumb for Linux, and *never* has been.
Use Google and learn something about it before you post false
statements.
Do you know what a 'rule of thumb' is? In days past, there was indeed a
rule of thumb if not a hearty recommendation for swap = 2*physicalRAM.
This was in the day before 1gb was fairly common, but indeed, it was there.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Jean-David Beyer
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: General Schvantzkoph
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Tauno Voipio
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- References:
- swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: General Schvantzkoph
- Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Prev by Date: Re: NEWBIE wants older LINUX for learning the basics
- Next by Date: Re: NEWBIE wants older LINUX for learning the basics
- Previous by thread: Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Next by thread: Re: swap size for 2gb 2 processors?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|