Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- From: floyd@xxxxxxxxxx (Floyd L. Davidson)
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 07:58:35 -0900
Michael Mol <mikemol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CBFalconer wrote:
Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
(Clone of the ancient and Very Good Norton Commander.)Which in turn was a clone of an older CP/M program, name
forgotten.
Funny how the best ideas are often the oldest. :-)
Funny... how perception works.
It was a *great* program for CP/M. I suppose it wasn't bad
for MS-DOS too.
It's pretty worthless for UNIX and its derivatives, because
while the CP/M and MS-DOS command lines were extremely limited,
that wasn't true of a Unix shell even back then.
Of course the basics of a Unix shell are older than CP/M, never
mind that program to manipulate files (the name of which still
escapes me too). Just think... if only the folks that copied
CP/M had been interested in doing it *right*, and had begun by
designing MS-DOS to emulate UNIX rather than simply setting it
as a means to fleece customers.
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- From: Michael Mol
- Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- References:
- Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- From: Michael Mol
- Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- From: Michael Mol
- Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- Prev by Date: Re: Promise SATA300-TX4302: How to find out if current kernels do support that adapter ?
- Next by Date: GPL-like license for images
- Previous by thread: Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- Next by thread: Re: A file that can be seen... but doesn't exist!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|