Re: thead security

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:52:18 -0500

seawind wrote:

HI all:
Call poll() function at two threads, and the important is the two
threads are waitting for the same socket descriptor . one of them is
set POLLIN , the other is set POLLOUT. What i want to know is whether
i should protect the socket descriptor by using lock. thanks advance

That might be a better question for comp.programming.threads.

--
Rosetta Code -- Building a Rosetta Stone for Programmers
http://rosettacode.org
.

References:
- thead security
  - From: seawind

Prev by Date: Re: what is criteria for judgment of i386 and x86 in linux?
Next by Date: Re: Problems updating FC6
Previous by thread: thead security
Next by thread: Re: thead security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

thead security
... Call poll() function at two threads, and the important is the two ... threads are waitting for the same socket descriptor. ... set POLLIN, ... i should protect the socket descriptor by using lock. ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)
Re: thead security
... threads are waitting for the same socket descriptor. ... set POLLIN, ... i should protect the socket descriptor by using lock. ... No need to do any locking, as long as you understand what you're ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)
Re: thead security
... threads are waitting for the same socket descriptor. ... set POLLIN, ... i should protect the socket descriptor by using lock. ... As long as you understand the basic concepts of thread programming and logic, and as long as you know how to properly handle any exception or error conditions, no locking is required. ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)