Re: can not delete empty files



On May 6, 10:26 pm, Yves Bellefeuille <y...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007, joelbrunetti wrote:
I am running on amd64 and the filesystem in question is XFS.

I agree with Dances With Crows that this is a file system problem.

The Gentoo handbook, which I think has useful information about file
systems, has this to say about XFS:

XFS is a filesystem with metadata journaling which comes with a robust
feature-set and is optimized for scalability. We only recommend using this
filesystem on Linux systems with high-end SCSI and/or fibre channel
storage and an uninterruptible power supply. Because XFS aggressively
caches in-transit data in RAM, improperly designed programs (those that
don't take proper precautions when writing files to disk and there are
quite a few of them) can lose a good deal of data if the system goes down
unexpectedly.

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=4

I think that ext3 is the best choice for most users.

--
Yves Bellefeuille
<y...@xxxxxxxx>

Hey Guys,

I got the files deleted.
xfs_repair was the tool for the job, not xfs_check.
It told me the inodes were pointing to free blocks and simply removed
the inodes.

Thanks for the advice on filesystem.
I prefer reiser3 to ext3 due to some performance issues that I am
unsure of they were resolved.
Reiser and I believe ext3 have some issues with deleting large files.
It can take quite a while.
I thought I would give xfs a try as it is supposed to be quite stable,
fast, and efficient.

I could be wrong about any of the above though and it comes down to
curiosity and personal preference.
I am very happy with it though.

Thanks for you help guys.
Joel

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
    ... >> Come ReiserFS and XFS into the game. ... usage scenarios ext3 is pretty fast. ... Reiser3 used to be fast when you had tens of thousands of small ... didn't even _have_ any recovery tools). ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: which to use: ext3, JFS, XFS, ReiserFS?
    ... debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. ... by UNIX ffs (fast filesystem) with decades of history. ... months ago when we heard from the Debian maintainer for the JFS utils ... I changed back to ext3. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: ReiseFS vs XFS
    ... > installation of the Debian system with XFS. ... ReiserFS is faster than ext3 ONLY for files under 4kB. ... would use the ext3 filesystem. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: [opensuse] Fwd: observed significant performance improvement in XFS a real-world application
    ... will consider XFS as the default suse OS install choice. ... the same partition ... Those that know or have different needs, can and do use xfs. ... All our application servers have been reiser3 for the last 6 years and no problems. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Panic with XFS on RHEL5 (2.6.18-8.1.8.el5)
    ... I've got a box running RHEL5 and haven't been impressed by ext3 ... so often the kernel panics as below. ... Does anyone have any hits/tips for using XFS on Red Hat? ... function in the call stack suggested to me that you might have an ext3 ...
    (Linux-Kernel)