Re: Umask strange behaviour 555=444 ?

Dan C <youmustbejoking@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:24:39 -0400, CBFalconer wrote:

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. See the following links:

Please fix your signature block. Netiquette recommends a 4-line limit on
signatures -- yours is 10 lines.

Pot, meet Kettle.

And the pedantic prick is posting with 2 signatures. He has been told
over and over again. But he's too stupid to find a free news service
which doesn't append its own sig to his otherwise worthless net nannying
drivel.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Increase buffer and cache?
    ... under 67 chars your posts will not be subject to such messing up. ... If you were to fix your two signatures then your busybody, annoying, ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Umask strange behaviour 555=444 ?
    ... Please fix your signature block. ... Netiquette recommends a 4-line limit on ... And the pedantic prick is posting with 2 signatures. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Honda service recommendations
    ... Now you just need to get everyone to change their signatures and ... fix the FAQ reminder post to point to that URL. ... Yeah. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Macro define function?
    ... You didn't fix the extra spaces, ... you didn't snip included signatures. ... >Is there some reason for that? ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Trojan horse affecting reboot.exe
    ... I'm curious which Virus checker you're using and which signatures. ... received the same indication this morning on a Win98 machine. ... Symantecs Norton Antivirus 2000 with signatures dated yesterday. ... > and says it is unable to fix the problem. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)