Re: segmentation fault in umask()
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:34:19 -0400
Mark wrote:
Mark <i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some programs (that I wrote) now always segmentation fault on Linux.
They used to work and they still work on all but one machine.
I ran strace and the last few lines are:
uname({sys="Linux", node="node", ...}) = 0
umask(02 <unfinished ...>
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (46) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Does this mean that it crashes in umask()? There is no corefile
produced.
This is on OpenSUSE 64 bit (2.6.18.2-34-default)
Please ignore. Problem solved.
And you obviously believe nobody else can possibly ever have the
same problem, so you refrain from giving the cause and/or cure.
--
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
<http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
<http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
<http://kadaitcha.cx/vista/dogsbreakfast/index.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- segmentation fault in umask()
- From: Mark
- Re: segmentation fault in umask()
- From: Mark
- segmentation fault in umask()
- Prev by Date: Re: memory leak... tricky
- Next by Date: Re: an_error
- Previous by thread: Re: segmentation fault in umask()
- Next by thread: an_error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
