Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: John Hasler <john@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:31:20 -0500
Dances With Crows writes:
Ripping out the requirement for X would probably lead to huge numbers of
potential bugs and a metric arseload of regressions.
All they have to do is check for command-line options that indicate lack of
need for X before they check for the presence of X. If making such a
trivial change leads to huge numbers of potential bugs and a metric
arseload of regressions they have serious design problems.
--
John Hasler
john@xxxxxxxxxx
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
.
- References:
- Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: mowsen
- Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: Curt
- Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: Robert Heller
- Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: Curt
- Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: Dances With Crows
- Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: Curt
- Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: Robert Heller
- Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- From: Dances With Crows
- Conversion software doc to pdf
- Prev by Date: Re: USB printer not working
- Next by Date: .profile .bash_logout scripts never get called in FC6
- Previous by thread: Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- Next by thread: Re: Conversion software doc to pdf
- Index(es):