Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:18:03 -0400
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Charles T. Smith wrote:.... snip ...
So the image on disk was fine, but the image as READ by the system
was corrupt, until you rebooted.
Actually, I guess I'll buy the arguments of the ECC (EMA?) posters
that it shows why ECC is a good thing.
I don't. I am fairly certain you had a corrupt transfer off the disk.
Doubtful. Disk extractions are checked (via a checksum/etc).
Without ECC memory errors go totally unnoticed, except for fouled
results.
--
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
<http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
<http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- References:
- how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: Charles T. Smith
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: ray
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: Charles T. Smith
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: Charles T. Smith
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- how can a bit be off in memory?
- Prev by Date: Re: Script to compile all files with a given extension?
- Next by Date: Re: "route add default" directive
- Previous by thread: Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- Next by thread: Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
