Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher <a@xxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:44:08 +0100
CBFalconer wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:Charles T. Smith wrote:... snip ...
So the image on disk was fine, but the image as READ by the system
was corrupt, until you rebooted.
Actually, I guess I'll buy the arguments of the ECC (EMA?) postersI don't. I am fairly certain you had a corrupt transfer off the disk.
that it shows why ECC is a good thing.
Doubtful. Disk extractions are checked (via a checksum/etc).
Up to the disk controller, yes. Then they are straight 8/16 bit transfers. Into maybe ECC memory.
The transfer is the weak point.
Without ECC memory errors go totally unnoticed, except for fouled
results.
Fouled transfers go unnoticed no matter what the RAM (as I discovered when it happened to me).
.
- References:
- how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: Charles T. Smith
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: ray
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: Charles T. Smith
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: Charles T. Smith
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- From: CBFalconer
- how can a bit be off in memory?
- Prev by Date: Re: Latest spam from groups.google.com...
- Previous by thread: Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- Next by thread: Re: how can a bit be off in memory?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|