Re: Lightweight desktops?
- From: Dan C <youmustbejoking@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:51:49 -0600
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:27:05 +0100, Robert Heller wrote:
A 'lightweight desktop' does lots less than Gnome and KDE. A lightweight
desktop generally means:
1) NO GUI file manager. You learn how to navigate the file
system with the shell from an xterm.
2) NO Heavyweight task / session manager. You lauch most
applications from the shell from an xterm.
3) NO 'Start' menu.
4) Little or no 'eye candy' (a very simple / sparse desktop). In
the extreme case it means no application launcher icons at all, just a
simple (usually text only) menu of very basic applications (web browser,
e-mail client, xterm, and a few odds and ends).
Basically, just a small step up from a pure console (no graphics at all)
setup.
I'd have to disagree with most of this, depending on how you define
"lightweight" desktop. Since the OP was referencing it to KDE/Gnome, I
would certainly include Xfce and Fluxbox in the category of "lightweight",
and they certainly do NOT meet any of the 4 conditions you specify above.
They have all of those features, and more.
--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lightweight desktops?
- From: Dan Espen
- Re: Lightweight desktops?
- From: Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas
- Re: Lightweight desktops?
- References:
- Lightweight desktops?
- From: A Watcher
- Re: Lightweight desktops?
- From: Robert Heller
- Lightweight desktops?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lightweight desktops?
- Next by Date: Re: Lightweight desktops?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lightweight desktops?
- Next by thread: Re: Lightweight desktops?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|