Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:39:39 -0800
On 2007-11-29, Ignoramus9168 <ignoramus9168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I need to set up several servers, some for my home business, and some
for my work. I do not need very many features like the latest
Bluetooth gizmos. I just want a system that does not crash a lot,
upgrades cleanly, has long term support, and uses system resources
nicely.
After recent disappointments with Fedora 8, I am looking elsewhere.
I hope you did not expect Fedora to run a stable server, since it is
explicitly designed to be a beta-quality distribution. If you did
attempt this, you really only have yourself to blame. If you want a
stable distribution, and want and rpm-based distro, try RedHat or the
free derivatives, CentOS or White Box.
I do not want much, all I need is kernel, filesystems, ssh, LAMP stack
and that's all. (where P stands for Perl)
<obSlackware> Slackware provides these things, and is a very stable
distribution. </obSlackware>
--keith
--
kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- From: Ignoramus9168
- Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- References:
- Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- From: Ignoramus9168
- Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Prev by Date: Re: how to mount a external harddrive without root priviledge?
- Next by Date: Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Previous by thread: Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Next by thread: Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
