Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- From: Ignoramus9168 <ignoramus9168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:46:22 -0600
On 2007-11-29, Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007-11-29, Ignoramus9168 <ignoramus9168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I need to set up several servers, some for my home business, and some
for my work. I do not need very many features like the latest
Bluetooth gizmos. I just want a system that does not crash a lot,
upgrades cleanly, has long term support, and uses system resources
nicely.
After recent disappointments with Fedora 8, I am looking elsewhere.
I hope you did not expect Fedora to run a stable server, since it is
explicitly designed to be a beta-quality distribution. If you did
attempt this, you really only have yourself to blame. If you want a
stable distribution, and want and rpm-based distro, try RedHat or the
free derivatives, CentOS or White Box.
I ran previous versions on servers, and it always ran great.
This one, is not the case due to fscked up installation.
I always try it on less important machines first.
i
.I do not want much, all I need is kernel, filesystems, ssh, LAMP stack
and that's all. (where P stands for Perl)
<obSlackware> Slackware provides these things, and is a very stable
distribution. </obSlackware>
- References:
- Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- From: Ignoramus9168
- Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- From: Keith Keller
- Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Prev by Date: Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Next by Date: Re: SMP & Java
- Previous by thread: Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Next by thread: Re: Which linux distro is the stables/strongest for SERVERS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
