Re: (OT) Nokia Buys Trolltech
- From: spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:32:41 +0000
In the sacred domain of comp.os.linux.misc,
Christopher Hunter <chrisehunter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> didnst hastily scribble thusly:
Tim Smith wrote:
In article <d8adnd3cOpoeHgPanZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stephan Rose <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
See the problem though is that it's going to take a few months to find
out if that will be the case or not. I and other developers can't wait
that long and for many people, myself included, a Nokia owned QT is not
appealing.
What problem(s) do you have with a Nokia-owned QT?
Nokia are /very/ precious about their software - you can be sure that qt
would go "closed" very quickly.
They can't close the currently released GPL licensed version.
An independent group could take up the slack whether nokia liked it or not.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: (OT) Nokia Buys Trolltech
- From: Harold Stevens
- Re: (OT) Nokia Buys Trolltech
- Prev by Date: Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- Next by Date: Les Casinos Playtech - Les Casinos Playtech
- Previous by thread: Re: (OT) Nokia Buys Trolltech
- Next by thread: Re: (OT) Nokia Buys Trolltech
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|