Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: ibuprofin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Moe Trin)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:03:20 -0600
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.misc, in article
<icejc1zoox.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Espen wrote:
ibuprofin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Moe Trin) writes:
Dan Espen wrote:
If your news reader supports it,
filter on the nntp-posting-host.
I don't _like_ to do that, as such scoring is "expensive" (the news
reader has to ask the server for that header on every post, which
slows things down substantially).
Yes, it slows things down but I didn't see anything else that
would help.
There are some things in the XOVER headers (From:, Subject:, References:,
Date:, Bytes:, Lines:, Message-ID: and Xref:) that become apparent when
you list them. I have my own spool via a downloading tool (slrnpull, but
leafnode does similar), and using 'cut' to look at individual headers in
the .xover file may be enlightening.
Upthread, you showed a list of 31 'NNTP-Posting-Host:' headers which I
understand to be sources of sporge runs. Looking at those with IP
addresses,
207.172.248.72 65.184.50.97 69.115.198.4 74.77.70.141 81.220.188.22
208.123.0.236 65.32.175.224 69.116.176.8 75.84.83.86 82.158.125.233
24.163.14.102 66.182.211.134 69.201.209.30 76.168.219.69 85.69.236.97
24.168.139.56 66.68.81.203 71.68.210.225 76.190.180.110 87.12.177.23
24.185.232.83 68.195.34.167 71.71.101.34 80.192.11.216 97.100.198.116
24.93.111.200 68.205.84.148 71.79.213.171 81.106.3.182 97.96.146.26
many of those (17 of 31) are Road Runner residential addresses - because
rr.com has no reliable controls on their server, and such a residential
network is where you can find Eleventy-Zillion windoze boxes waiting to
be zombied (if they aren't already on 'Open Proxy" lists). Actually,
all but two of your list are obvious broadband residential IPs. Because
there are so many readily exploitable boxes on the Internet, the chance
of a single host being re-used to spam/spew after the incident that
caused you to note the address is extremely low.
Old guy
.
- References:
- UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Kevin the Drummer
- Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Harold Stevens
- Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Richard Kimber
- Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Dan Espen
- Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Jean-David Beyer
- Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Dan Espen
- Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Moe Trin
- Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- From: Dan Espen
- UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- Prev by Date: Re: Help needed on server managment
- Next by Date: A new reader? Welcome to comp.os.linux.misc, read this first if you're new here (FAQ)
- Previous by thread: Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- Next by thread: Re: UGH, TOO MUCH SPAM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|