Re: Libraries are *not* executable, correct?
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:35:39 -0700
On 2008-04-30, Robert Heller <heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, you cannot execute a .so file on its own.
Well, almost:
$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.2, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 3.3.3.
Compiled on a Linux 2.4.26 system on 2004-05-24.
Available extensions:
GNU libio by Per Bothner
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
linuxthreads-0.10 by Xavier Leroy
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
libthread_db work sponsored by Alpha Processor Inc
NIS(YP)/NIS+ NSS modules 0.19 by Thorsten Kukuk
Report bugs using the `glibcbug' script to <bugs@xxxxxxx>.
$
I haven't found any other libraries executable in this fashion. But
there's at least one. :)
--keith
--
kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information
.
- References:
- Re: Libraries are *not* executable, correct?
- From: Robert Heller
- Re: Libraries are *not* executable, correct?
- Prev by Date: Why isastream() alway returns 0?
- Next by Date: A PAN question
- Previous by thread: Re: Libraries are *not* executable, correct?
- Next by thread: Why isastream() alway returns 0?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|