Re: Things Linux Can Do Without
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 23:22:21 -0700
On 2008-05-30, jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2. /usr/local
It's ALL local. If not, then the convention should be "/usr/network".
local means site-specific, not local vs network.
So what is
"/usr/local" being used for nowdays? People that are too scared or lack
the know-how to muck with /usr. Remove the old version if needed,
install into /usr and be done with it.
What old version? What if you're installing a binary that's not part of
the distro? Are you going to build packages for every single piece of
software you install?
How long is your PATH to hit all
those /usr/local/crap/bin directories?
That's just silly--make symlinks in /usr/local/bin.
These same people post to mailing
lists wondering why xyz won't build: "But I have libbadidea installed!
It's in /usr/local/badidea, why it says 'not found'?"
I don't have a great solution for this; making symlinks into
/usr/local/lib can help, or options to configure to put libraries in
better spots. Or these people can just read the install docs. ;-)
Q: Does using Windows really cause brain damage?
A: Yes.
Cute. :)
--keith
--
kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Things Linux Can Do Without
- From: Gregory Shearman
- Re: Things Linux Can Do Without
- References:
- Things Linux Can Do Without
- From: jayjwa
- Things Linux Can Do Without
- Prev by Date: Things Linux Can Do Without
- Next by Date: Adsense .easiest way me making money
- Previous by thread: Things Linux Can Do Without
- Next by thread: Re: Things Linux Can Do Without
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|