Re: make vs rpm vs srpm vs yum : questions about package management in Linux.
- From: Rahul <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 17:42:33 +0000 (UTC)
Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:bar3h5x82s.ln2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
This is mostly a matter of taste. What you should not do is configure
&& make && make install when installing will overwrite software
managed by rpm or some other package manager. But if you do compile
yourself, and install to /usr/local (which is the whole purpose for
/usr/local), you shouldn't have a problem.
Thanks Keith! So, will yum / rpm *never* (or almost never) install software
to the /usr/local/ folder? Just making sure I understand the install-dir.
convention correctly? Is the /usr/local/ meant only for the user? What
places (/bin /usr/bin /usr/sbin come to mind) does yum / rpm prefer to
install stuff in and again is there a convention?
I feel comfortable doing a from source install since the EXEC_PREFIX,
LIB_PREFIX etc. allow me to know where the files are getting installed to.
But frequently I do a 'yum install' and end up with no idea of where it
actually added the files to!
--
Rahul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Great Permissions Tutorial
- Next by Date: Re: Things Linux Can Do Without
- Previous by thread: Re: make vs rpm vs srpm vs yum : questions about package management in Linux.
- Next by thread: Re: make vs rpm vs srpm vs yum : questions about package management in Linux.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|