Re: Help needed on replacing a failed drive
- From: Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:58:58 GMT
Dances With Crows wrote (in part):
This is why Red Hat offer (so to speak) both Red Hat Enterprise Linux and
The trouble with Fedora is that it has too many bugs, is too difficult
to upgrade, and goes out of date too quickly.
Fedora. It has less bugs, is fairly easy to upgrade, and does not go out of
date for seven years. To get this, you do not get the latest and greatest
bleeding edge software; instead you get freedom from bugs and long-term
stability. You can upgrade every year and a half (roughly), but you do not
have to. I usually skip every other one.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 06:55:01 up 8 days, 20:52, 4 users, load average: 4.01, 4.13, 4.21
.
- References:
- Help needed on replacing a failed drive
- From: amerdsp
- Re: Help needed on replacing a failed drive
- From: 1PW
- Re: Help needed on replacing a failed drive
- From: Allen Kistler
- Re: Help needed on replacing a failed drive
- From: Dances With Crows
- Help needed on replacing a failed drive
- Prev by Date: Re: Things Linux Can Do Without
- Next by Date: (www.fashion4biz.com)supply nike sports shoes(paypal accept)
- Previous by thread: Re: Help needed on replacing a failed drive
- Next by thread: Max no of files in a directory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
