Re: VM Linux client && smbclient host OS
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:15:51 +0100
Walter Mautner schrieb:
The drive is too big to upload it to the VM and perform the search.
I would not touch NTFS file systems from non-Windows systems. The results are unpredictable, due to the undocumented implementation and the possible extensions (in Windows code) of such a file system.
How is the performance of VM guests on vista? I'd rather prefer the
other way round (Xp/vista/whatever as guests on a linux vmware host)
Every machine behaves best with the host OS that is shipped together with the machine - usually some Windows system. My current machine came with Vista, and I could make an Linux host work for it, apart from some unsupported devices (TV card, power saving...), but I couldn't make work an XP on it, due to missing drivers.
I cannot notice a difference between Linux guests on a Windows host, and Windows guests on a Linux host - the guest systems run and react as fast as the host system does.
DoDi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VM Linux client && smbclient host OS
- From: Walter Mautner
- Re: VM Linux client && smbclient host OS
- Prev by Date: Re: IBM Lotus Symphony Office Sute (free as in beer) runs on Linux
- Next by Date: Re: Text console option in bootloader (grub)
- Previous by thread: Text console option in bootloader (grub)
- Next by thread: Re: VM Linux client && smbclient host OS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
