Re: More woes building the binutils suite
- From: "Greg Russell" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:16:19 -0700
In news:qrsua6-c0d.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Mark Hobley <markhobley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
I extract the source tarball as follows:....
tar xjf binutils-2.19.1.tar.bz2
I created a build directory and made this current:
mkdir binutils-build
cd binutils-build
There's the problem right there ... there is no need for you to create an
empty directory and then run the compilation while hiding in a foxhole.
I configure the package for compilation:
../binutils-2.19.1/configure --build=$BLD --target=$TGT
--prefix=/tools --disable-nls --disable-werror
Ok so far.
No it's not ... stay in the directory that was created for the package when
you un-tar'd the bz2 file and type:
../configure --build=$BLD --target=$TGT --prefix=/tools --disable-nls --disab
le-werror
.... and then "make".
make will navigate the expected directory structure in the proper order to
compile the package.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More woes building the binutils suite
- From: Mark Hobley
- Re: More woes building the binutils suite
- From: Mark Hobley
- Re: More woes building the binutils suite
- References:
- More woes building the binutils suite
- From: Mark Hobley
- More woes building the binutils suite
- Prev by Date: Re: I thought I could "just" re-install Ubuntu
- Next by Date: Re: How do you use yum-protect-packages?
- Previous by thread: Re: More woes building the binutils suite
- Next by thread: Re: More woes building the binutils suite
- Index(es):