Re: Small Linux disto without X and with GCC



Jules <jules.richardsonnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 02 May 2009 02:55:46 +0100, Bombadil wrote:
Yeah, I remember tuning Slackware a little a few years ago and it came out
around 150MB with X; with a bit more effort it probably could have
matched that. I did have a minimalist setup (no X) running from a 32MB
CF card.

If the OP is benchmarking though then maybe it's not a fair test to do a
massive amount of fine-tuning, and a basic 'stock' install would be more
suitable (not that Slackware runs a whole pile of services automatically
like some of the distros do)

DSL isn't slackware anymore. It's debian.

Yes, I wasn't claiming that it was - just that somewhere around that sort
of footprint appeared to be the 'sweet spot' for a useful graphical
Linux system.

I'm sure with considerable effort it could have been reduced further,

Doesn't take much. Replacing the graphical user interface with
simple bash menus and the graphical apps it calls with console
apps, where possible (and it's possible for most of them)
helps a great deal.

The console apps are almost always immeasurably superior to
the graphical ones.

but
for what I was doing it just wasn't beneficial to do so (I was playing
around with network-booting machines, and a 150MB footprint for the OS
image on the server-side was 'small enough')

Sure.

Bombadil
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [kde] Why KDE4 is called KDE?
    ... Kmenu does NOT find most apps. ... be "KDE specirfic" as Kevin also pointed out. ... As I've pointed out repeatedly Krunner really offers no functionality ... folks could port QB code into Gambas and write console apps. ...
    (KDE)
  • Re: AssemblyVersion - what if I want to enter DLL Hell?
    ... specifically bound to a version of a DLL. ... > The title is a joke, clearly I don't want DLL Hell. ... > I regularly develop performance improvments to 'Utility.dll' which I> want all the console apps to benefit from. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Neophyte Question(s)
    ... Smaller footprint and CLR independence, ... I have used C++ for device drivers, interop dlls and realtime apps. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc)
  • Re: Console Applications
    ... Or you open command line first and then execute ... your executable from command line instead of double-clicking it. ... because I want to build Windows apps and not console apps right now? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Console Applications
    ... I'm running Windows XP ... applications with out it shutting off on me? ... because I want to build Windows apps and not console apps right now? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)