Re: rsync mystery
- From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:29:29 +0000
Chris Davies wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Oh, I don't care about encrypting the data. Its terminally boring. Help yourself! Incremental backups of my inbox? who gives a shit. Its all come in in clear anyway.rsync is encrypted anyway.
Are you sure? I'd infer from the paragraph (Debian man page) "USING
RSYNC-DAEMON FEATURES [...]" that this is not the case:
Rsync supports connecting to a host using a remote shell [...]. This
can be useful if you want to encrypt a daemon-style transfer’s data
[...]
and:
For another way to encrypt a daemon transfer, consider using ssh [...]
Chris
The latest drawing I am working on? what the heck. Theres probably only three people in the world it would be of any use to, and I know em all ;-)
Any data that is sensitive is already envcrypted where it is..
No, I am more concerned about malicious attacks on the server..harder to do with rsynch than ssh.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rsync mystery
- From: Chris Davies
- Re: rsync mystery
- References:
- rsync mystery
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: rsync mystery
- From: J G Miller
- Re: rsync mystery
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: rsync mystery
- From: Chris Davies
- rsync mystery
- Prev by Date: Re: rsync mystery
- Next by Date: Re: cat for binary file
- Previous by thread: Re: rsync mystery
- Next by thread: Re: rsync mystery
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|