Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:09:45 +0200
On 28/09/2010 21:43, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-09-28, Kenny McCormack<gazelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:In article<Xns9E018153B7BBC6650A1FC0D7811DDBC81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Rahul<nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
I found minicom via a google search. If there is a better alternative I'm
up for trying that one too.
I always found minicom weird and hard to use. It seems to be a program
bound-and-determined to make itself difficult to use.
My sentiments exactly. I avoid minicom if at all possible. It has one
of the most convoluted and obtuse UIs I've ever seen in a console-mode
program. That and its mule-like insistence that you're supposed to
have a modem connected to every serial port never cease to annoy me.
I may be a bit old school, but I still use Kermit whenever I need to
do serial port stuff. Kermit is rock-solid and has been for 25+
years. Just don't look at the source code. You'll go blind.
Compatibility with every OS and C compiler shipped since 1980 is _not_
a pretty thing.
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ck80.html
I usually build it without lockfile support since that just gets in
the way of the sort of stuff I do.
For serial comms under Unix (GUI), I've long used Seyon - it is also
is a little hard to setup/configure [*], but once you get past that,
it works very well.
But, and here's really the point, a really nice console mode serial
comm program is the "screen" program. It is easy to configure/setup
and it "just works". On one particular Unix system, where I use
screen exclusively for serial connections, the last line in my
.screenrc file is something like:
screen /dev/ttyXX 115200
So, when I run screen from the shell prompt, I am immediately
connected to the serial port. So, I suggest you try this instead of
minicom.
Well, I'll be darned.
I've been using screen for 20 years. I even ported it to the Coherent
OS (a 16-bit v7 clone) sometime back around 1990 -- after writing a
pty driver for Coherent, and I never knew screen did serial port
stuff. When I read the above, I thought you were talking about a
different program.
That's news to me too - I've been looking for something nicer than minicom for serial communications. I do most of my serial communications from a windows PC, and use Tera Term Pro there. When I have used my Linux laptop with minicom, it has worked but it's a step back to the dark ages (I'm the kind of person who prefers command-line gdb to gui debuggers, but even I find minicom old-fashioned).
I use screen daily when connecting to servers, and even when working on a desktop, but I never new it supported serial communication like this. Many thanks!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- From: John Hasler
- Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- References:
- serial port connection using minicom: no data
- From: Rahul
- Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- From: Kenny McCormack
- Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- From: Grant Edwards
- serial port connection using minicom: no data
- Prev by Date: Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- Next by Date: Re: for i in {1..$1}, $1 can't be used
- Previous by thread: Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- Next by thread: Re: serial port connection using minicom: no data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|