Re: Okular vs. Acroread.
- From: AZ Nomad <aznomad.3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:41:57 -0500
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:07:03 +0200, David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/10/2010 01:38, notbob wrote:
On 2010-10-02, Todd<Todd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lights up like a Christmas tree
Chrystonacrutch! I had no idea. Is there anything on an M$ box that
isn't a raging crapstorm?
This is only partly MS's fault. It's MS's fault that an application
like Acrobat reader is able to stomp all over the system, but it's
Adobe's fault that Acrobat reader will do this when asked by the pdf.
Each company has failed to implement their sandboxes and the limits
There is never a reason for *any* document viewer to execute attachments.
Shame on adobe for thinking like microsoft, that seeing some stupidity like
dancing bunnies running around your document is more important than security.
Seems adobe has forgotten the difference between code and data, has been
hiring microsoft programmers who have never understood the difference.
- Prev by Date: Re: Okular vs. Acroread.
- Next by Date: Re: Okular vs. Acroread.
- Previous by thread: Re: Okular vs. Acroread.
- Next by thread: Re: Okular vs. Acroread.