Re: host can't attach to small network
From: Llanzlan Klazmon The 15th (Llanzlan_at_Llurdiaxorb.net)
Date: 09/15/03
- Next message: Clifford Kite: "Re: can't get dial-up connection to work"
- Previous message: Les Mikesell: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- In reply to: George Bell: "host can't attach to small network"
- Next in thread: Michael Buchenrieder: "Re: host can't attach to small network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 15 Sep 2003 13:52:33 +1200
George Bell <MasterofTimeADim@netscape.net> wrote in
news:3F647EAA.6030609@netscape.net:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I've got a small ethernet network consisting of two hosts and a
> linksys router. These all connect to a 5-port linksys hub, where the
> router attaches to "uplink". I have Windows running on one host, and
> Suse Linux 7.6 on the other.
Be careful about using the uplink port on the hub. They are often
defaulting to crossover (they sometimes have a push button switch to
uncross the uplink port). The uplink is generally intended for daisy
chaining another hub or switch. Try connecting the router to one of the
normal ports on the hub.
Rgds Llanzlan.
<SNIP>
- Next message: Clifford Kite: "Re: can't get dial-up connection to work"
- Previous message: Les Mikesell: "Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?"
- In reply to: George Bell: "host can't attach to small network"
- Next in thread: Michael Buchenrieder: "Re: host can't attach to small network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]