Re: Simple Switched Network

From: Neil Horman (nhorman_at_rNeOdShPaMt.com)
Date: 10/01/03


Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:58:10 -0400

John wrote:
> Sorry for the vague description. Here is a better picture of the
> situation.
>
> The setup is a small and very loosly parallel cluster. The five
> computers are connected through a Linksys 10/100 5 port switch. The IP
> scheme is 172.16/16 (the 192.168 and 10 IP ranges are in use by other
> networks). They can ping (or do anything else network related) to
> themselves using both their 172.16.1.* address and their 127.0.0.1
> address. They cannot however reach other computers on the network.
>
> The first computer is the controller and it has 2 NICs. The first one
> is not an issue as it connects to my LAN (not this little setup) just
> fine. The second card appears to work fine. This machine, just like
> the others, will not talk to any computer on the switch but itself.
>
> The other computers have just 1 NIC. I'm beginning to suspect that the
> problem is with these and not the main computer. The following is the
> output of the requested commands on these 4 machines.
>
> ifconfig:
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr <the mac address is here>
> inet addr:<the IP address is here> Bcast:172.16.255.255
> Mask:255.255.0.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:1120 (1.0 kb) TX bytes:1120 (1.0 b)
>
>
> netstat -rn:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
> irtt Iface
> 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 40 0
> 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 40 0
> 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.5 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0
> 0 eth0
>
> mii-tool -v:
>
> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
> product info: vendor 00:00:00, model 0, rev 0
> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
> capabilities: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
> advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
> link partner: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
> flow-control
>
>
> The IP addresses are:
> 172.16.1.1
> 172.16.1.2
> 172.16.1.3
> 172.16.1.4
> 172.16.1.5 (control node)
>
> The four other machines use the 8139too driver for the NICs. I just
> looked a dmesg and found that they complain a bunch when the computers
> are starting up.
> During bootup I get errors on the four machines. Such as:
> 1.) NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> 2.) 8139cp: 10/100 PCI Ethernet driver v0.3.0 (Sep 29, 2002)
> 3.) In reference to the 8139 driver:
> init_module: no such device
> insmod 8139cp failed
> insmod /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/drivers/net/8139cp.o.gz failed
>
> Note: #2 is not really an error but it comes up about 9 times during
> boot so maybe something is wrong there.
>
> There were also mentions of "too much work at interrupt" for IRQ11.
>
> I thought that maybe there was an IRQ conflict so I checked
> /proc/interrupts and the other thing listed on IRQ11 is onboard USB
> (although the BIOS also listed the video card as using IRQ11). I tried
> disabling onboard USB in the BIOS but it still shows up in
> /proc/interrupts.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks so much!
Are you certain that 8139 is the correct driver for your NIC's? If you
are getting no such device errors when the (assumed) driver module for
these nics inserts, it is certain not to work. Typically no such device
(ENODEV) is returned by a driver when the module cannot find the
appropriate device and vendor ids for its device on the pci bus. I'd
grab the 8139 driver source code from the kernel tree, and compare the
pci device and vendor ids against the ids reported for your nic in
/proc/pci.

HTH
Neil

-- 
/***************************************************
  *Neil Horman
  *Software Engineer
  *Red Hat, Inc., www.redhat.com
  *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
  *http://www.keyserver.net
  ***************************************************/


Relevant Pages

  • Local Network Access Problem
    ... I have two windows xp pro machines running sp2. ... nics. ... internet from both machines. ... Both computers show when I click on view workgroup computers. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Local Network Access Problem
    ... windows too much precious work would be lost. ... > I have two windows xp pro machines running sp2. ... > nics. ... Both computers show when I click on view workgroup computers. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Local Network Access Problem
    ... Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net ... I have two windows xp pro machines running sp2. ... nics. ... Both computers show when I click on view workgroup computers. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: upgrading frm XP Home to Pro
    ... Windows XP Home - unless ... The machines in question would access the central file repository ... Windows XP Home computers using very quickly (unless you record a lot of ... connects to the Internet, but I bet there is some sort of Cable/DSL Router ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: can we break the wordwrap limit in kmail?
    ... on dumb serial terminals on UNIX machines?" ... I can tell you why your life is actually interfered by my existance: ... HTML is a rendering language and its rendering depends on the ... computers from becoming the remote tools for people who _do_ wish to ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)

Loading