Re: Simple Routing with Redhat 9
From: Ivan Marsh (annoyed_at_you.now)
Date: 11/14/03
- Next message: alt: "Re: sending faxes"
- Previous message: Clifford Kite: "Re: serial cable connections"
- In reply to: Jimbo Johnes: "Simple Routing with Redhat 9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:19:06 -0600
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:54:37 +0000, Jimbo Johnes wrote:
> Greetings,
> This has been keeping me awake for 3 days now, so I am turning to you for
> help.
> My objective is to set up a simple firewall using iptables using RH9 as my
> gateway. I have 8 ip addresses [5 usable] starting from 64.138.38.42 - 46.
> .41 is the ip address of the modem. .47 is the broadcast ip. I have 2 NICs
> eth0[external] -64.138.38.42 and 64.138.38.45; gateway = .41
> the other NIC, internal, is 192.168.1.101, with no gateway. I have routing
> enabled so the workstations on the internal LAN can browse the net.
> Simple, isn't it?
> There are no iptables rules loaded at this time, so anyone is free to go
> in and out. The problem is that when I telnet into the firewall .42 and
> issue wget from the server on the local LAN [.108] to get me a small image
> [about 100 bytes] everything is fine, but when the image size is larger
> 10K+ the wget either hangs or very slow. I am running snort to log the
> packets and i see the packets being send in and out of the server [.108],
> but the process never completes. anyone had similar experience? any idea's
> what is going on? i appreciate any help,
>
> misha
No, but your next problem is going to be the massive denial of service
attack you'll, no doubt, be under for cross-posting and including your IP
address.
-- i.m. The USA Patriot Act is the most unpatriotic act in American history.
- Next message: alt: "Re: sending faxes"
- Previous message: Clifford Kite: "Re: serial cable connections"
- In reply to: Jimbo Johnes: "Simple Routing with Redhat 9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
