Re: ARP Scans
From: ch ganser (chganser_at_gmx.net)
Date: 12/25/03
- Next message: Ekkehard Kraemer: "PPPoE switched into the LAN (no dedicated NIC)"
- Previous message: Awie: "Re: Double Masquerade for Load Balance ?"
- In reply to: Neil Horman: "Re: ARP Scans"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 11:29:20 +0100
thanks neil and michael
but thought the computer should only verify the entries he uses and not
try to verify the hole subnet before even using it. or am i wrong?
we use a private b-network behind a nat/pat bridged over severeal
locations and all ports are switched (the network design is not our
choice). currently only 2750 ips out of the b-network are used by dhcps.
strange is, that some computers try to resolve macs for ips, that have
never be used.
do all os'es behave like neil said? i though if a mac is older than
10min the computer sends a who-has package if he needs to make a
connection. no active behavior.
thanks allot!
christoph
Neil Horman wrote:
> ch ganser wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> In our network, some hosts behave quite strange:
>> They produce between 1000-30000 arp "who-has" packages per day. our
>> gateway and dns-server have only around 500.
>>
>> is there an other explaination than an arp scan (any normal application)?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> chganser
>>
> Sure, linux by default makes sure that entries in the arp cache are
> good. If you have a large network, with lots of machines on a
> particular network segment (read: reachable via arp), then you will tend
> to have a large arp cache on each linux box. If those machines don't
> produce alot of traffic, or if your network is segmented with switch in
> such a way that the linux boxes don't see that traffic, then they will
> periodically send out arp requests to veryify the entires are still
> good. Its quite easy on a network with a high degree of segmentation
> (via switches) to have a linux box produce the number of arps you
> mention. Theres nothing wrong it. If you feel that its unneeded
> traffic on your network however, its also fairly easy to tune down. In
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh you will find several directories, 1 for each
> network interface on a system, plus a default (aka "all interfaces")
> directory. In these directories are several files allowing for the
> tuning of arp behavior (if you are unfamiliar with the proc filesystem,
> these are also settable via the sysctl interface). The values in these
> files are documented in section 7 of the arp man page (man 7 arp). Here
> you can do all sorts of things like changing the number of entries
> allowed in the arp table, thresholds before the garbage collector runs,
> times to wait before verifying addresses, etc.
>
> HTH
> Neil
>
- Next message: Ekkehard Kraemer: "PPPoE switched into the LAN (no dedicated NIC)"
- Previous message: Awie: "Re: Double Masquerade for Load Balance ?"
- In reply to: Neil Horman: "Re: ARP Scans"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|