Re: WGR614 router act only as an access point? No seperation of WAN and LAN?
From: darin Ginther (d_ginther_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/08/04
- Next message: Robb: "DSL vs Cable modem ---what is difference when connecting to internet?"
- Previous message: Iguanaman: "Re: Help me with the PPP dialup!!!"
- In reply to: James Knott: "Re: WGR614 router act only as an access point? No seperation of WAN and LAN?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Jan 2004 13:41:43 -0800
You're right.. It's 614v3.
I solved the problem.. Rather simple solution when you think about it,
but Netgear told me it couldn't be done.
I simply removed the WAN connection. I used the device as a dumb-hub.
IE, plugged the LAN side into my linux gateway and static IP'd
everyone.
There isn't any way to do it using the LAN and WAN connections.
James Knott <bit_bucket@rogers.com> wrote in message news:<VnbLb.49121$1g41.10567@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>...
> darin Ginther wrote:
>
> > Basically I need my LAN and my WAN to be on the same subnet. Is this
> > possible? I need this device to act as an "access point" - not as a
> > router.
> >
>
> For security reasons, I put my wireless "router" between my Linux firewall
> and cable modem. I then use a VPN to get past my Linux firewall. I also
> use 128 bit WEP. This way, should anyone break the WEP, they'd only get
> internet access and not connect to my home network.
- Next message: Robb: "DSL vs Cable modem ---what is difference when connecting to internet?"
- Previous message: Iguanaman: "Re: Help me with the PPP dialup!!!"
- In reply to: James Knott: "Re: WGR614 router act only as an access point? No seperation of WAN and LAN?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|