Prioritizing traffic: Possible?
From: Nicolas Keller (nicolas.keller_at_slb.de)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: chris-usenet_at_roaima.co.uk: "Re: fastest network protocol"
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: Linux netfilter/iptables firewall : impacts on performances ?"
- Next in thread: Alexander Clouter: "Re: Prioritizing traffic: Possible?"
- Reply: Alexander Clouter: "Re: Prioritizing traffic: Possible?"
- Reply: P Gentry: "Re: Prioritizing traffic: Possible?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Apr 2004 07:36:40 -0700
I'm not sure if I can do something in the following situation:
|Our network| |Other Network|
| |
|Linux router|---|RouterX|---<Slow Connection>---|RouterY|
Our network is connection to another network via a very slow 64kbit
connection. The last router I have access to is the Linux router,
everything else, including RouterX and Y are not accessible. Users are
complaining about very slow connections espescially when someone
starts a large file up- or download.
In terms of configuration I know how I can prioritizing certain
traffic to improve response time. My question is: Can I do something
even if I don't sit at the bottleneck? As my router is connected to
both sides with 100Mbit, it should be difficult to prioritize traffic,
or am I wrong?
- Next message: chris-usenet_at_roaima.co.uk: "Re: fastest network protocol"
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: Linux netfilter/iptables firewall : impacts on performances ?"
- Next in thread: Alexander Clouter: "Re: Prioritizing traffic: Possible?"
- Reply: Alexander Clouter: "Re: Prioritizing traffic: Possible?"
- Reply: P Gentry: "Re: Prioritizing traffic: Possible?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|