Re: Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server
From: Robert A. Reissaus (r.a.reissaus_at_risdi.com)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: Villy Kruse: "Re: Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Previous message: Bernhard Voigt: "DNS problem in .local domain"
- In reply to: Daniel Rigal: "Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Next in thread: Villy Kruse: "Re: Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Reply: Villy Kruse: "Re: Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 15 Jun 2004 05:19:21 -0700
I have, more or less, the same problem. Only I am using WYP Sp1a Which
doesn't the Windows->Linux problem. But I do have the same problem
between SuSE 9.1 and SuSE 9.0. I believe it is caused by SuSE 9.1
using only IPv6 and addressing interfaces by a hardware address
instead of an interface name. I say this because after having
installed SuSE 9.1 Pro on another machine the problem no longer exists
between those two. I am not sure about WY2K, but the problem would
probably go away if you there would be a IPv6 path.
(b.t.w. I noticed that I suddenly have another route added (to
169.254.0.0 -> to internal card) which has nothing to do with my
network; do you have the same?)
Regards,
Robert A. Reissaus
r.a.reissaus@risdi.com
IBM/Informix Consultants fot the BeNeLux
--- daniel.rigal@ntlworld.com (Daniel Rigal) wrote in message news:<4171a413.0406140820.7e6c879b@posting.google.com>... > Hi everybody, > > How weird is this? > > I installed a Linux server for the company Intranet (SuSE 9.1 Pro) and > gave it a static IP address. I set up the Linux box to use our Windows > 2000 Active Directory server for its DNS and that is where it gets > weird. It almost works. DNS works fine as far as external (internet) > addreses are concerned. They are resolvable and pingable. It is only > internal addresses which are problematic and even these are only > partially broken. "nslookup" works fine on an internal address when > run from the linux box. "host" works fine too. "dig" only works if you > give it a fully qualified domain name to look up but fails on an > unqualified one. The really annoying thing is that the command line > utilities like "ping" can't resolve internal addresses at all, whether > they are fully qualified or not, which makes life rather difficult. > > Before anybody asks, I don't think I have done anything stupid setting > it up. There is only one DNS server listed and nsswitch.conf is set up > to use DNS for host resolution. > > Does anybody have a clue what could be going on? Does anybody else > have similar issues, or must I have done something silly to mess it > up? I know that people mistrust the Windows 2000 DNS server but, given > that "nslookup" and "host" can resolve against it, you would think > that everything else could too? Do they use different methods to query > the DNS server? > > Any suggestions for resolving this would be appreciated. > > Regards, > > Daniel Rigal MSc.
- Next message: Villy Kruse: "Re: Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Previous message: Bernhard Voigt: "DNS problem in .local domain"
- In reply to: Daniel Rigal: "Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Next in thread: Villy Kruse: "Re: Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Reply: Villy Kruse: "Re: Linux DNS Client Against Windows 2000 DNS Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|