Re: Hub to hub, but wireless
From: Domski (domski_at_web.de)
Date: 07/05/04
- Next message: William Park: "Re: netcat as an http proxy server"
- Previous message: John Thompson: "Re: tool to show data rate"
- In reply to: Dave Brown: "Hub to hub, but wireless"
- Next in thread: David Efflandt: "Re: Hub to hub, but wireless"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:19:57 +0200
Am Mon, 05 Jul 2004 16:14:10 GMT hat Dave Brown
<dhbrown@hobbes.dhbrown.net> geschrieben:
> I have 2 machines in room A, one being my main desktop; and 2 in room B,
> one being my firewall, the other my web-name-dhcpserver; there's a hub
> in
> each room: the room A hub is a satellite of the room B hub. So they're
> all on the same "network"; I think I need to keep it that way, as the
> firewall does NAT and port-forwarding for the other three machines.
> I'd like to be wireless between the 2 hubs, as right now a wire is draped
> across my entry hallway, (no attic or underfloor access for the wire).
>
> I haven't seen any configurations in the various "guides" that address
> this situation. (And I'm looking for a "least-cost" solution.) Any
> suggestions?
>
you are looking for two wireless access-points, which both act as
transparent bridge. It might be possible with the most AP's, but only use
same AP's from the same vendor. Different AP's doesn't connect or cause
lot of problems.
-- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
- Next message: William Park: "Re: netcat as an http proxy server"
- Previous message: John Thompson: "Re: tool to show data rate"
- In reply to: Dave Brown: "Hub to hub, but wireless"
- Next in thread: David Efflandt: "Re: Hub to hub, but wireless"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|