Re: pptp mppe as other than root?
From: stephen (stephen_at_aloss.net)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: JM: "Re: Windows shares using samba: problems with blank spaces."
- Previous message: Dave Brown: "Re: ASUS WL330 for WIFI?"
- In reply to: Tauno Voipio: "Re: pptp mppe as other than root?"
- Next in thread: Tauno Voipio: "Re: pptp mppe as other than root?"
- Reply: Tauno Voipio: "Re: pptp mppe as other than root?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 03:57:31 GMT
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:55:59 +0000, Tauno Voipio wrote:
Thanks, Tauno. I've filled in below:
> stephen wrote:
>> Finally! after much dickering around, swatting, and so on, I've managed to
>> connect to my employer's windows vpn and access my work files. But I have
>> to do it as root.
>>
>> I don't like that. I work for a software shop and there are some very
>> smart people (yes there are some smart windows geeks) with idle evenings
>> who love to poke around. As the first linux user in our company to do
>> this, I'm going to be a target. I prefer that if someone pokes into my box
>> that they poke into some place that does not have root access to the rest
>> of my life. They can poke into my work stuff - fine! They know it all
>> anyway since it's all in the abysmal VSS. But I want to be fairly sure
>> that they'll get 'access denied' to any other area of my personal life.
>>
>> Ideally I could put all the vpn components under a group that does not
>> have access.
>>
>> Can I do that? I've looked through the docs at
>> http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/ and I've googled my fingers sore, but
>> all I see is stuff like "Solution: you have to be root".
>>
>> Say it isn't so or say that I'm just being silly and that I'm in some
>> magically way protected from intrusions.
>>
>
> There are too little details to give meaninful advice.
>
> Please describe the connection and printouts from:
>
> ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xxx
inet addr:192.168.0.101 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1491 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:371 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:549984 (537.0 Kb) TX bytes:33929 (33.1 Kb)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x4000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:2356 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2356 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1794391 (1.7 Mb) TX bytes:1794391 (1.7 Mb)
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:10.12.1.57 P-t-P:10.12.1.50 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1496 Metric:1
RX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
RX bytes:114 (114.0 b) TX bytes:126 (126.0 b)
> route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
10.12.1.50 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
10.12.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 ppp0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
>
> taken when the tunnel is up. If you like, you can
> obscure the top part of public IP addresses. If the
> internal networks use RFC 1918 addresses (10.x.y.z,
> 172.16.x.y-172.31.x.y, 192.168.x.y), please do not
> obscure them.
>
> Do you use Samba to access the Windows files?
Yes:
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2004/09/15 18:29:08
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = #HIDING COMPANY NAME
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 50
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
domain logons = Yes
dns proxy = No
wins server = 10.12.0.11
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No
>
> The VPN is just a network connection. In Linux, building
> and ripping network connections is considered to be such
> tasks that they should be limited to root only. This does
> not mean that the connections should be used as root only.
> This means that the tunnel should be started as root and
> log in as a normal user for using the tunnel.
My current configuration requires me to mount as root.
# ls -l /dev | grep ppp shows all listings like this:
crw------- 1 root root 45, 128 Sep 15 2003 ippp0
This crw is new to me!
>
> There are plenty of different ways to build a VPN
So I have discovered! But only one that works so far.
> tunnel, so details are also needed here (PPTP?).
PPTP with MPPE
>
> You should be able to armour your system against intrusions
> from the company network in the same way as it has to be
> done for Internet connections. You do have a firewall in
> place, do you?
My iptables are out-of-the-box Fedora Core 1. When I was
experimenting I found that iptables on or off made no
difference to the VPN connection. So the current configuration
probably offers no protection. I have of course done some
research into iptables, but don't understand them well enough to
feel secure in this situation. I am working through a stack of
books and enjoying it, but right now I'd like to meet my employment
obligations without reinstalling windows.
>
> There are reports that the average break-in time to an
> unprotected WinXP computer is 20 minutes, if the computer
> is connected to a broadband connection. We have practical
> experience - a freshly installed Windows 2000 workstation
> was broken in before it had time to get all the Microsoft
> patches needed to protect it (pretty near the reported
> average time: 17 minutes).
Given an opportune moment, I suspect that a knowledgeable intruder could
make root on my vpn-ed linux box in five minutes or less.
I know I have a lot to learn, and I am eager to learn that lot.
Thanks for your help.
>
> HTH
>
> Tauno Voipio
> tauno voipio (at) iki fi
>
> protect against the intruders.
- Next message: JM: "Re: Windows shares using samba: problems with blank spaces."
- Previous message: Dave Brown: "Re: ASUS WL330 for WIFI?"
- In reply to: Tauno Voipio: "Re: pptp mppe as other than root?"
- Next in thread: Tauno Voipio: "Re: pptp mppe as other than root?"
- Reply: Tauno Voipio: "Re: pptp mppe as other than root?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]