Myth: Linux has a lower TCO ( was Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL)
From: /dev/null (dev.null_at_BeginThread.com)
Date: 12/09/04
- Next message: /dev/null: "Myth: Linux has a lower TCO ( was Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL)"
- Previous message: Lenny G.: "Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL"
- In reply to: Davide Bianchi: "Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Myth: Linux has a lower TCO ( was Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL)"
- Reply: Bill Unruh: "Re: Myth: Linux has a lower TCO ( was Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:49:53 GMT
> Myth: Linux has a lower TCO
> Fact: If you consider that buying NT licenses for business use is
> tax-deductible, as are all those tech support calls, NT actually has a
> lower TCO than Linux! How are you going to expense software that doesn't
> cost anything? Eh?!?
That's lame.
So with NT you spend money on lic and support and pay 25% of that money
spent less in taxes. Let's see an example:
let's say that your lic and support for NT cost $20,000 for a year. So now
you take that as an expense and don't pay tax on that so that saves you
roughly $5,000, you neted a total of -$15,000 ($20,000 spent minus $5,000
saved in taxes).
With linux there was no cost so you saved the entire $20,000 and paid taxes
on it, roughly $5,000. So you neted a total of +15,000.
That's a $30,000 difference. Your company could have bought a datacenter
full of equipment for that amount of money.
I hope you're not in charge of the finances for your company. With lamer
advice like this small companies go broke and big ones end up like enron.
Wake up. M$ will never make more sense than Linux.
I'll bet you take out a home mortgage so you can pay the bank an extra
$10,000 in interest per year so you don't have to pay taxes on that money,
saving you $2,500 but putting you in the hole by $7,500 a year.
L-)
- Next message: /dev/null: "Myth: Linux has a lower TCO ( was Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL)"
- Previous message: Lenny G.: "Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL"
- In reply to: Davide Bianchi: "Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Myth: Linux has a lower TCO ( was Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL)"
- Reply: Bill Unruh: "Re: Myth: Linux has a lower TCO ( was Re: DNS (A 1.0.0.0) problem with DSL)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|